Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Mayor's Race: 1st, 2nd, 3rd & 4th in Top 50 Precincts

I've been taking a look at the precinct level data in the Nov. 3rd mayoral election in lots of different ways. This look is at the top 50 precincts for number of votes cast (check out how high the turnout was in these top 50 - most are well above the 19% average turnout for all precincts).

I'm thinking about what a Peter Brown endorsement means to the candidate he endorses today. He got approximately 40,000 votes, with a little over 10,000 of them coming from these 50 (out of the 750 or so of total precincts in the City of Houston). Where do these 10,000 voters go in the runoff?

In this precinct set:
Parker came in first in 29 precincts, second in 16 and 5 in third. She did not come in last in any.
Morales came in first in 19 precincts, second in 12 and 13 in third.
Brown came in first in one precinct, second in 21 and 28 in third.
Locke came in first in one precinct, second in zero, 4 in third, and 45th in fourth.

Morales coming in first, second and third in so many of these tells you that many of these top performing precincts are in Republican areas. A big question is how Republicans vote in Round 2. I believe they'll turnout, because they love a Saturday runoff in December (not kidding), and they want to cast their vote for a Republican in the Controller, At-Large 1 and At-Large 5 races. Will a bunch of them skip the mayor's race? I doubt it.







PCT
TURNOUT
Brown
Morales
Parker
Locke
0265
38.14%
318
443
348
201
0258
39.55%
236
445
376
187
0234
34.77%
268
402
358
225
0439
37.49%
251
393
367
137
0129
23.27%
243
345
394
176
0407
30.12%
286
343
299
110
0309
42.73%
239
391
292
113
0204
30.13%
250
224
410
123
0303
32.71%
245
259
296
214
0461
29.64%
273
291
342
90
0620
16.95%
272
208
262
191
0281
38.63%
206
159
477
147
0270
28.17%
241
265
377
71
0448
28.32%
185
292
383
90
0286
17.85%
167
42
139
589
0469
26.62%
237
424
220
69
0385
44.28%
216
293
279
119
0760
24.27%
204
457
208
49
0262
22.89%
214
300
295
91
0217
36.18%
223
158
384
159
0040
35.20%
239
83
529
75
0222
39.10%
195
86
520
111
0057
31.18%
156
127
561
64
0483
22.07%
217
308
265
91
0095
29.38%
198
349
274
61
0663
26.69%
166
210
415
82
0444
27.84%
227
264
276
72
0148
35.17%
176
122
484
75
0070
29.23%
188
149
388
126
0054
25.89%
157
197
384
107
0718
21.69%
246
272
233
87
0200
27.60%
170
115
483
78
0118
41.37%
164
312
271
83
0199
27.87%
225
420
144
48
0135
32.34%
200
157
337
131
0563
27.90%
224
340
194
59
0435
27.99%
170
248
305
92
0038
31.76%
138
60
529
79
0287
31.10%
153
214
362
75
0274
29.02%
170
186
248
160
0130
35.48%
221
240
241
91
0324
35.31%
187
271
264
71
0233
20.86%
161
140
384
109
0612
24.08%
169
348
196
52
0053
29.50%
143
106
456
72
0034
30.47%
114
49
578
33
0499
34.00%
182
235
259
95
0304
34.49%
160
170
355
74
0039
31.00%
114
51
539
62
0437
39.44%
135
359
182
67

4 comments:

Josh said...

Do you have the precinct numbers for the top 50 listed above??

Thanks for the great coverage

muse said...

Oh, good heavens. I didn't realize the precinct numbers didn't publish! I'm about to give up on blogger. Let me see what I can do to fix this.

muse said...

OK, fixed! Still not great formatting, but it's all there.

Josh said...

Thanks for the update, it's appreciated.